2007-03-02
XRuby 0.1.2 released
XRuby 0.1.2 is now available for download from the project download page: http://code.google.com/p/xruby/downloads/list
This latest release contains more built-in libraries and a few bug fixes for the compiler. We expect to release a new stable version every month.
Last week, Antonio Cangiano did a very interesting job to compare the performance of different ruby implementations using YARV's benchmark suite. XRuby is not included in his test as Antonio may not know our project exists. For people who are interested, here is the XRuby's performance data (due to my limited resource, only ruby 1.8.5 interpreter was compared):
>java -Xmx512m -jar xruby-0.1.2.jar benchmark\run.rb
The test environment is Intel Pentium M 1G CPU, 1G Memory, Windows XP SP2, Java 1.5.0_09. It may be worth to mention we have done almost nothing for optimization, not even a simple method cache. I think it is quite possible for a JVM based ruby compiler to beat the classic Ruby interpreter on performance, while YARV's number is going to be very hard for us to reach.
This latest release contains more built-in libraries and a few bug fixes for the compiler. We expect to release a new stable version every month.
Last week, Antonio Cangiano did a very interesting job to compare the performance of different ruby implementations using YARV's benchmark suite. XRuby is not included in his test as Antonio may not know our project exists. For people who are interested, here is the XRuby's performance data (due to my limited resource, only ruby 1.8.5 interpreter was compared):
>java -Xmx512m -jar xruby-0.1.2.jar benchmark\run.rb
| Test | Ruby 1.8.5 | XRuby 0.1.2 |
| bm_app_answer.rb | fail | fail |
| bm_app_factorial.rb | fail | fail |
| bm_app_fib.rb | 20.42 | 33.84 |
| bm_app_mandelbrot.rb | 7.270 | 15.33 |
| bm_app_pentomino.rb | 294.2 | 956.9 |
| bm_app_raise.rb | 4.906 | 4.597 |
| bm_app_strconcat.rb | 5.917 | 5.858 |
| bm_app_tak.rb | 26.46 | 38.95 |
| bm_app_tarai.rb | 21.08 | 35.51 |
| bm_loop_times.rb | 14.83 | 93.55 |
| bm_loop_whileloop.rb | 26.26 | 76.5 |
| bm_loop_whileloop2.rb | 5.327 | 16.15 |
| bm_so_ackermann.rb | fail | fail |
| bm_so_array.rb | 19.35 | 300.2 |
| bm_so_concatenate.rb | 5.868 | 26.58 |
| bm_so_count_words.rb | 2.253 | 46.43 |
| bm_so_exception.rb | 9.893 | 9.973 |
| bm_so_lists.rb | 3.696 | 41.04 |
| bm_so_matrix.rb | 6.328 | 21.29 |
| bm_so_nested_loop.rb | 15.38 | 68.20 |
| bm_so_object.rb | 21.97 | 20.77 |
| bm_so_random.rb | 6.269 | 15.69 |
| bm_so_sieve.rb | 1.992 | 5.476 |
| bm_vm1_block.rb | 65.67 | 98.91 |
| bm_vm1_const.rb | 48.05 | 82.31 |
| bm_vm1_ensure.rb | 46.19 | 75.38 |
| bm_vm1_length.rb | 55.62 | 105.6 |
| bm_vm1_rescue.rb | 36.47 | 80.91 |
| bm_vm1_simplereturn.rb | 57.12 | 88.16 |
| bm_vm1_swap.rb | 76.21 | 85.73 |
| bm_vm2_array.rb | 18.64 | 19.65 |
| bm_vm2_method.rb | 33.41 | 35.32 |
| bm_vm2_poly_method.rb | 45.42 | 47.78 |
| bm_vm2_poly_method_ov.rb | 12.81 | 25.98 |
| bm_vm2_proc.rb | 21.54 | 31.23 |
| bm_vm2_regexp.rb | 13.40 | 52.35 |
| bm_vm2_send.rb | 11.87 | 31.60 |
| bm_vm2_super.rb | 13.98 | 20.25 |
| bm_vm2_unif1.rb | 11.46 | 19.95 |
| bm_vm2_zsuper.rb | 15.84 | 21.92 |
| bm_vm3_thread_create_join.rb | 0.120 | 1.402 |
The test environment is Intel Pentium M 1G CPU, 1G Memory, Windows XP SP2, Java 1.5.0_09. It may be worth to mention we have done almost nothing for optimization, not even a simple method cache. I think it is quite possible for a JVM based ruby compiler to beat the classic Ruby interpreter on performance, while YARV's number is going to be very hard for us to reach.
发表评论
yawl
- 浏览: 12167 次
- 详细资料
搜索本博客
最新评论
-
gem.config的一个小问题
haha, 正是我想要的。 谢谢！
-- by yawl -
gem.config的一个小问题
config.gem 'solr-ruby', :lib => 'solr'
-- by rainux -
最近的ruby的vulnerabilit ...
robbin 写道哈哈，原来是一个项目，那肯定需要做一些代码方面的修改，无可避免 ...
-- by neodoxy -
最近的ruby的vulnerabilit ...
哈哈，原来是一个项目，那肯定需要做一些代码方面的修改，无可避免的。
-- by robbin -
最近的ruby的vulnerabilit ...
robbin 写道neodoxy 写道Quake Wang 写道phoenix5 ...
-- by neodoxy
评论排行榜